nyanidoc Reviews and Ratings
nyanidoc
Amazing and punctual as always!
Very careful editor! Thank you for the detailed editing and the extra notes explaining some general rules of grammar!
lmao. What is the difference using the personalized service with using Grammarly? I don't see any improvement in quality by using the service from Editor World. Did you just use a software to do the work?
Detailed and helpful
Amazing and punctual as always
That's was fine
Always give me the best feedback for my work!
Dear nyanidoc,
I would like to thank you for your excellent work.
Best wishes,
Riccardo
Thank you so much. Your correction and comment are beneficial to me.
Thanks,
Masa
Nyanidoc is the most helpful editor I have ever met. Thank you so much for your precious work!
On nyanidoc you can always count, is a guarantee. The accurate and prompt work has been an invaluable resource in giving the best version of my products and learning how to improve my writing.
Many thanks for all of your editing, clarifiying comments, and quick turn around. Hope you can help me out again next fall.
Many thanks for all of your editing, clarifiying comments, and quick turn around. Hope you can help me out again next fall.
Many thanks for all of your editing, clarifiying comments, and quick turn around. Hope you can help me out again next fall.
Many thanks for all of your editing, clarifiying comments, and quick turn around. Hope you can help me out again next fall.
The most helpful editor who I have ever met. Thank you so much for your hard work!
Thank you, nyanidoc.
Many thanks!
Lucia
I have received comments from reviewers that I should have language check. I used the version you edited for me. Please see reviewer comments below:
.............................
Reviewer reports:
Thank you for your effort in investigating the e-waste LCA and LCC in Thailand. This is an important study. However, after a careful examination I recommend a major revision. Please find my honest opinion below, and most importantly do not be discouraged.
General comment:
1. The methodology section needs a major revision. Please clarify the common study design parameters for LCA (refer to ISO14044 or https://www.lcatextbook.com/). Please clarify the terms and calculations in LCC, preferable with equations (even a simple equation will help).
2. The results of LCA must be reexamined. I have serious concern when you use the emission factor of recycled materials in ecoinvent (which may include a system expansion, to consider the replacement of virgin materials). This is not wrong but should be consistent with your goal and scope definition. Revise either one of them.
3. In general, it is preferable to have a language check by native or good English speaker to improve the expression.
I am very impressed with amazingly quick turnaround time and outstanding quality of editing.