Dear MasterEditor,<br /><br />Thank you for your editing. I&rsquo;m very happy with your corrections and suggestions, but I have some questions. If those questions cost extra, please let me know.<br /><br />1. We ourselves were not sure if we should use &ldquo;molding&rdquo; or &ldquo;moulding.&rdquo; At this time, the exhibition is held in Germany and many German injection molders and some molders in EU prefer to use &ldquo;moulding.&rdquo; I know it&rsquo;s not common outside EU, but do you recommend molding even if it&rsquo;s intended for EU market?<br /><br />See the URL below for your reference. It&rsquo;s a website of major injection molder in EU.<br /><br />https://www.engelglobal.com/en/at/solutions/injection-moulding-machines.html<br /><br />To me, I prefer molding, but just considering the target market, I&rsquo;m not quite sure. Your suggestion would be highly appreciated.<br /><br />2. Why &ldquo;impose a limitation on&rdquo; has to be &ldquo;impose a limitation to?&rdquo;<br /><br />3. In this sentence, &ldquo;The dispersion of the aggregation and control of the filler orientation has to be achieved for the successful elimination of surface defects,&rdquo; I think we should use &ldquo;have&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;has&rdquo; as it says &ldquo;both A and B(multiple subjects) have to be achieved.&rdquo; What do you think?<br /><br />4. &ldquo;Here are what we got from TOSHIBA MACHINE&rdquo; was modified to &ldquo;Here is what we got from TOSHIBA MACHINE&rdquo; Later in the slide, multiple benefits are explained. In this case should we use &ldquo;are,&rdquo; not &ldquo;is?&rdquo;<br /><br />5. I changed &ldquo;until they eventually had to give up the test&rdquo; to &ldquo;until the customer eventually had to give up the test.&rdquo; Or maybe &ldquo;until the user eventually had to give up the test&rdquo; because in the earlier part of the slide, it says &ldquo;One of the users of the TOSHIBA MACHINE performed overload tests on major electric machines.&rdquo; Could you give me a suggestion?<br /><br />6. As for the sentence, &ldquo;TOSHIBA MACHINE has been meeting and exceeding the expectations of customers at Nisshin Industrial Ltd.,&rdquo; for us, &ldquo;meeting and exceeding the expectations of customers at Nisshin Industrial Ltd.&rdquo; is not what we meant. If we say like that we talk only about Nisshin&rsquo;s customers. It&rsquo;s not a big deal if TOSHIBA satisfies only limited customers of one of their users.<br /><br />We say &ldquo;meeting and exceeding the expectations of customers&rdquo; to give general idea. So here &ldquo;customers&rdquo; means customers around the globe. But Nisshin is one of them. What we wanted to say was &ldquo;Nisshin Industrial Ltd. is one of the satisfied customers.&rdquo;<br /><br />Maybe is it better to say &ldquo;TOSHIBA MACHINE has been meeting and exceeding the expectations of customers around the world. Nisshin Industrial Ltd. is one of those satisfied customers?&rdquo;<br /><br />Thank you very much!<br /><br />Kind regards,<br /><br />Yas