Hi George,<br /><br />This is the same response I submitted to my "difficult" prof. which you edited nicely, but&nbsp;he turned it down, giving me the "opportunity" to re-write it. I did.&nbsp;<br /><br />The reason being is that he thought that my previous one was general and has no "scientific value". He wants me to generate research questions and propose methods/hypotheses to tackle them, and look at specific aspects of the phenomenon they examine in these three articles, for which he is the co author of one.&nbsp;<br /><br />I tried my best in this refurbished version to be very specific, and to use technical terms and the jargon that they like. Albeit I know nothing will please him, but I am giving it try with your assistance to make it sound more "rigorous"/scientific. He&nbsp;is a positivist in that he only accept scientific evidence and abhor even the language of other approaches. Do you see my agony? On top of that, I am currently writing my second research paper I told you about for his class!<br /><br />Anyhow. I hope you are not too exhausted just by the thought of this :)<br /><br />I appreciate your help!<br />Best,<br />Maya&nbsp;