Hi you're welcome; it is very interesting to read you commentaries; since U.S. forces left we do not hear much about events in Iraq. To answer your notes:

1. On this first sentence, I made minor punctuation changes.The sentence is strong. If you would just copy and paste it over, you should be OK. Here it is:

Furthermore, to enforce his power, al-Maliki plans to weaken the historical role which Hawza (the Shiite religious school based in Najaf, Iraq) has been playing in shaping the Shiites politics, believing that undermining the Hawza can put him in a stronger position where he’s no longer in need for Hawza Clergies or Iranians to legitimize his government.

2. 2) Here I meant to say that Kurds have already appealed to Washington for intervention to solve the dispute over budget.>>>> "In either case, this will result in Kurdistan appealing to Washington for intervention, especially since passage of the new state budget and budget law, both of which were boycotted by Kurdistan." 

Understand now. makes sense.

3.  can I say:>>>"Instead, Iraqi people are faced with a government in which its leaders are too busy fighting each other for another term in office than providing public service to their communities. "

I added two words; again, if you cut and paste you are fine. (PS your description applies to U.S. politics as well....) 

Let me know how else I can help.

Ben