<p>Dear George,&nbsp;<br /><br />Thank you for great editing!&nbsp;<br />I got an extension so now are making a few revisions. There are two sentences that I need your review. &nbsp;<br />1) Your edited setence: "The literature of Asian skilled migration has not sufficiently examined trans-national comparisons." I'm not quite comfortable with &lt;examined comparison&gt;. To make my intention clearer, I revised it to <br />"The literature of Asian skilled migration has not sufficiently compared multiple countries under particular themes." &nbsp; <br />Many policy reports just described each country's experience without comparing them on a particular concept. So I need to emphasize that my work differs from those descriptions. &nbsp;<br />2) I added a new sentence and need your review<br /> "I started with the genderal debate on the driving force behind skilled immigration and link that issue to the question of what are the contributing factors to diverging scopes and patterns of importing skills in the three countries."&nbsp;<br /><br />I won't make further question related to this work. By the way, I have one more manuscript on the transnational lives and subjective well-being of immigrants in Korea. I want to get your editing on this work in several weeks. Hope you may like this topic.&nbsp;<br /><br />Thank you again!<br /><br />Oh-Jung</p>