Hello, 
I received your note via Patti. I have copy-pasted it below and responded as requested. 

"The editor suggested that I cut off some
of the background and add to the research methodology. Why this is an
excellent suggestion, it would be more helpful if the paragraphs to cut are
recommended to avoid deleting useful information." 

I can see that you have made some edits and sent a new document. If you would like this new document to be edited, you will need to re-submit it for a new estimate. In general, I recommend that you cut paragraphs that are more subjective and focus on presenting more objective, evidence-based information. For the paragraphs that you keep, I have already suggested places where more information/references are needed to substantiate certain statements; please refer to the comments in the margins by reading the document in "track changes" mode. 

"My editor also asked if I am going to publish the article as promotional or
scholarly paper. I have before submitting the document that I wanted to
publish it as scholar (exploratory) research. Therefore, I would like my editor
to re-read the document from a scholarly publishable article."

I did in fact assume that it was to be a scholarly piece and commented accordingly. If you have questions about specific comments, please let me know, but I have in fact edited the paper to indicate the changes I think it would need to be a publishable work. 

Finally, I know some editors wouldn’t tell you if the article is publishable
and write do not want to hear that his or her paper is the great. However, I
am looking for an unbiased and constructive critique, edit and review of this
paper. Therefore, I am asking my editor to make suggestions to improve the
article.

I have in fact made these comments. If you would like assistance with the new document, please submit it to Patti for a new estimate, and don't hesitate to ask for clarification on specific issues from the prior paper. 
Best regards,
Lore