Hi,<br /><br />I apologize I am submitting this in Pages format because my computer doesn't have Word, but I will be able to receive it in Words however. I don't know the word count so I just estimated it. I will paste the document here too. <br /><br />Please consider to edit my document <a class="spell" href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&biw=1440&bih=811&q=thoroughly&spell=1&sa=X&ved=0CBoQvwUoAGoVChMIjf_byb3SxwIVxJeACh2sSgq_"><b><i>thoroughly</i></b></a>: grammar, style, coherence, sentences, sturucture, word choice. I don't mind heavy editing. <br /><br />Thanks,<br /><br /><p> </p><p> </p><p>Political science, as a body of knowledge and as a filed, has been struggling with identity, freedom, equality, and even superiority in conjunction to other types of sciences. Among the categories for supremacy is homogeneity and the predictive capacity of its quantitive theories and models. </p><p> </p><p>Perhaps a prudent way to look at sciences and knowledge in general as though they are “fragments” and “shadows” of an ambiguous universe filled with puzzles and amusements. There has been the unsolved question of “how we know what we think we know”, which remains a “challenge” to the human potency as a whole. This realization may serve to taper off some of the prejudice expressed by scientists in different fields. </p><p> </p><p>Historically, the field struggled for defining concepts pertinent to political phenomenon while avoiding conformity.  The practice of politics, best known as “the political behavior” has emerged from primitive methods of leading societies , as it developed to serve contemporary needs albeit such needs may be derivatives of the past itself, which bring into question the perceived identity of the discipline of political science, as the call for divorce from “hard” science is clear and loud. Therefore, call for uniqueness and individuality of the filed became a necessity for survival. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The debate about who dominates the sphere of the political science filed should be viewed as a wake up call to consider the bureaucracies and politics practiced within filed by those who like to assume ownership of the filed, and attempt to create a more diversified arena of perspectives. One way to do that, is perhaps looking at political phenomenon such as democracy and justice from a holistic view yet considerate of the individuality of each case.</p><p> </p><p>Once again, the filed is challenged by the reality of not only how to generate ideas but also how to make ideas interact with each other. To survive the time test, since must not reproduce themselves, and so are ideas. As suggested by one of the reading assigned to this class that although, there hasn’t been a definitive rule as how to be a political scientist, real life experience proves to be a significant factor of constituting a good scientist. Another feature might prove to be helpful to the filed is the need for exposing scientists and scholars to public along with the research procedure they conduct, in hope to find ways to interact with the subjects of research. </p><p> </p><p>Striving for survival, the political science must seek to diversify its existed theories and expand upon more contingency analysis, welcoming new methods, and build its educational foundation on awareness, interacting with the public as subjects rather than objects. </p><p> </p><p> </p>