OK, here it is.&nbsp; Thanks again for allowing me to work with you and your very interesting manuscript.&nbsp; You commented that the ms. seems "plain", but it appears to me that you've handled this complicated and rather esoteric&nbsp;topic well, and for this type of work, plain language is probably the best.&nbsp; Note my comments re: the use of "potteries".&nbsp; I also do try to apply my understanding of archaeological semantics/usages throughout, though it's always possible that conventions for your region could be somewhat different.&nbsp; I think your discussion of Kim's work is quite reasonable and measured.&nbsp; Please let me know if you have any questions.&nbsp; RebeccaTDE