Dear editor,<br /><br />I have a question while reviewing your edited document. <br />First of all, do you have impression that your edited version should be ok for review in journals? I meant that (as I stated before) the manuscript must be super-well written. Do you consider your edited version is good to submit?<br /><br />Second, the following sentence you edited seems somehow odd, what I meant that the word "and" is written two times. Do you have other suggestion that has the same meaning? or is your revised sentence fine with it? I just wanted to double check, in case you did a mistake..<br />--&gt; the sentence you revised is as follows.&nbsp;<br /><br />The pure samples from the homogenized culture (1:1 dilution) were analyzed <strong>and</strong> other measurements were performed on serial dilutions <strong>and</strong> half dilutions (1/2 D) of each concentration at each step until a 1:256 dilution level was reached, which corresponds to the detection limit of the spectrophotometer. <br /><br />Lastly, I forgot to include the following sentences in my previous document. Can you please quickly check it and let me know if these are free of errors.<br /><br />1. __ will be announced one week before the submission due date. __ must be presented in a professional manner (e.g. neat, stapled, on time). Late submission will not be acceptable.<br /><br /><br />2. A scientific calculator is permitted. Sharing calculator is not permitted (this applies the same for the final exam<br /><br /><br />3. Please note that the final __ is non-cummulative.<br /><br />4. Site visit reports must be submitted within one week of the following visit. Refer to the note for a format and other&nbsp;comments.<br /><br />5. Note on tests: no cell phones or any other devices that make noise or vibrate are not permitted.<br /><br />6. Final __ is scheduled to take between ___ and ___.<br /><br />7. Site visit report format<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />