Hi,&nbsp;<br /><br />Thank you for your awesome editing! <br />I thoroughly looked at the edited version&nbsp;today, since I was overwhelemed by other stuffs that were in my hand. And I have some questions about your comments.&nbsp;<br /><br />For your comments on "reading was panacea for my homesickness" in the 4th paragraph, you suggested that the transition is a bit awkward since I focued more on the coures, rather than the reading. <br />I was meaning that reading the course materials triggered my interest and I could overcome the homesickness as I immersed in the course. So I thought that reading was the fundamental trigger and said that the reading was a panacea. Do you think it is still awkward transition? Should it be changed to "the politics course" was a panacea? I would like to hear your opinion.&nbsp;<br /><br />Also, in the 5th paragraph, I mentioned the Pi Sigma Alpha since I think it might be better for me to address this is an honor society. But after reading my essay and your comments, I think I might delete these sentences (furthermore ~~ political issues), since the explanation is too vague. Do you think I should keep these sentences or delete them or just modify them?&nbsp;<br /><br />I would really appreciate if you could provide replies for my inquiries.&nbsp;<br />Thank you again for your help!<br /><br />Sincerely,<br />Jaeyoung&nbsp;