Hello, Happy new year!
I Just attached the new file for editing the grammar error in my paper as one day editing, but unfortunately I just finished my writing now, so just in case to help you to understand my least of work I will put the last part of my writing here. I know you don't have to edit this last part, but I hope that it will help you to edit my writing better. 

The Last part of the writing right after the file that I attached early.

Therefore, it is important issue to know who the sovereign is. In addition, if Hobbes defined the sovereign, then we can compare the difference between Hobbess political perspective and liberal perspective of the state. If the major subject is different, then we cannot exactly compare who is referring to as the sovereign between different perspectives.  
In conclusion, the answer for the primary questions about the interpretation of Hobbess Leviathan is that, he developed the solid structure of his argument about what commonwealth is and how people should do for their survivor in society. However, he had the lack of explanation of who is going to be peoples leader of state and how the authorized ruler can protect them efficiently from the fear of death. When we compare Hobbess Leviathan with the liberal perspective, we should be careful about we are referring to the same concept of sovereign in commonwealth.