<p>Hi Seyyed:</p>
<p>In this paper, you have written something quite original. It took three readings before I began to understand it, so I&rsquo;m the first to admit that I provided more of a proofreading service than an editing service. Where I could I tried to smooth the flow without of course changing the content, but most of the changes were just cosmetic. Here and there I substituted a different word which I thought captured your meaning more completely. With track changes, of course, it&rsquo;s easy to accept or reject any or all editing suggestions. I followed the journal&rsquo;s editing guidelines as closely as possible. In fact, there were no problems doing so.</p>
<p>I added two brief footnotes because I thought some qualification was needed, but again, you can decide if that is so.</p>
<p>All that remains is for me to say how much I enjoyed reading your paper (several times). I believe you&rsquo;ve made an original contribution to philosophy / physics, which is praise indeed! All that is needed now is for your ideas to be read as widely as possible.</p>
<p>If you have any questions, please don&rsquo;t hesitate to get in touch via Editor World.</p>
<p>Best wishes and good luck with the journal - George</p>