*I really cannot understand about Chicago style paper. please work on the with the format and flowness, grammar, organization, structure. Please make it perfect well developed thingking essay. Professor really wants a depth concent essay. I think my sentence is too light to address this thesis. Please work on the phrase as high quality. Thank you so thank you so much and I really like and love your eiditing style!!~ If you have any question please message me!*<br />Paper Requirements In order to complete the assignment, you will need to: <br /><br />1. Choose 1 painting, print, sculpture or a piece of architecture created between 1848 and 1888. Although you don’t have to limit yourselves to the works of art found locally, it is highly recommended that you try to work with a ‘live’ object. <br /><br />2. Carefully study the chosen work in order to develop a question that will drive your analysis/research. <br /><br />3. Compile a bibliography of appropriate theoretical and factual sources. In the least, the bibliography should include works of scholars referenced in this course (Berger, Boime, Broude, Chu, Clark, Crow, Eisenman, Foucault, Fried, Garb, Greenberg, Herbert, Nochlin, Pollock, Rubin, Silverman, Thomson, to name a few). The following partial reading list should provide an initial direction. You don’t have to limit yourself to it. <br /><br />4. Conceptualize your paper and write an introduction. The intro should consist of 4 parts/paragraphs. The following examples are excerpted from Darcy Grimaldo Grigsby, “Nudity à la grecque in 1799,” The Art Bulletin, Vol. 80, No. 2, 1998 <br /><br />I. <strong>Captivating Description.</strong> Present the work of art and/or its detail that intrigued you. Wake up the women at the right of Jacques-Louis David's Oath of the Horatii of 1785 and place them between the male warriors. Now remove the men's clothes. This is the startling, even preposterous, double move of David's Intervention of the Sabines of 1799. … The [painting]'s awkward character derives from the tensions not only between female dress and male nudity but also between the women's action and the men's frieze-like [stillness]... <br /><br />II. <strong>Research Question.</strong> Introduce the question/problem//issue that you would like to investigate. David's martyr portraits of isolated, unconscious, and eroticized male bodies, like his Death of Joseph Bara of 1793, astutely and economically offered an iconography for the radical fraternal Republic. [However], his transposition of the solitary male nude into a [composition] that prominently included dressed [and forceful] women proved problematic. Is there a way to elucidate this novel conjunction of naked male bodies and newly central female protagonists? <br /><br />III.<strong>Literature Review.</strong> Summarize how other scholars dealt with this specific issue or similar ones. Scholarship has for the most part treated these … as separate issues. While the nudes have been described in terms of …, the Sabine women's prominence has been interpreted as ... Historians have also typically emphasized the success rather than the tensions of David's theatrical painting. That success, we have been told, hinged on … This has been the emphasis of scholars like [A.A.], who has argued that …, and [B.B.], who has characterized the work as … By contrast, [C.C.] has emphasized women's feminist activism during the French Revolution and David's reliance on women as figurations of disorder. However, she, too, has argued that the Intervention of the Sabines ultimately contains … According to [C.C.], David's painting represents above all … These accounts take as their premise the success of David's painting in matching its audience's needs [and in bringing the audience together]. <br /><br />IV.<strong>Thesis Statement</strong>. Outline your argument as it builds upon the previous scholarship. … In fact, David's Intervention of the Sabines did not reconcile its fractured audience. … [T]he painting was certainly a box-office success ... But the votes made by admission fees are evidence less of consensus than of interest, and that interest, this paper will argue, derived from the work's controversy, its failure to deploy antiquity as a unifying metaphorical language. Ironically, David's very success in giving revolution antique form ultimately led to classicism's loss of authority. Nudity à la grecque in 1799 could not be disengaged from the dramatic return of women to center stage. <br /><br />5. Present your introduction and bibliography to the professor in a one-on-one meeting during the office hours. This meeting is required and will count toward your participation grade. <br /><br />6. Write the body of the paper substantiating your claims with significant research and detailed analysis. Conclude by summarizing all of your main points. <br /><br />7. Proof-read your text for grammatical errors and make sure that all of your arguments and their support flow well. If English is not your first language (and even if it is), take your draft to the writing center and ask them to edit/proof-read it. <br /><br />8. Footnote the paper in the Chicago Style with a bibliography attached at the end of the paper. (http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html See point 1: notes and bibliography) <br /><br />9. Submit the paper on Thu Sept 9 @turnitin.com (by 11:00 pm).<br /><br />