<p>1) Revise and Resubmit Part A- <strong>&nbsp;Previously completed&nbsp;and got an 88%<br /><br />This revision should encompass:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;2a) Describe Policy Evaluative Criteria</p>
<p>Before policymakers can decide which policy alternative is the best, they must know what</p>
<p>criteria they will use to decide among them.&nbsp;Define the criteria used and provide justification for their use. In other words, why those</p>
<p>criteria?</p>
<p>2b) Project Outcomes and Outcomes Matrix</p>
<p>You will project the outcomes for each policy alternative in the context of each evaluative</p>
<p>criterion.</p>
<p>&nbsp;You must discuss the table in the body of the paper.</p>
<p>You should discuss how certain you are of the outcomes for each policy alternative. Think about</p>
<p>sensitivity analysis. Also, think about how &ldquo;robust&rdquo; your policy is to unanticipated events.</p>
<p>Your description of the evaluative criteria and your projection of the outcomes should be</p>
<p>approximately 3-5 pages. In total, your working paper should be about 6-10 pages.</p>